Watch Trade Of Innocents Download Full

Western Banks, Governments Launch Full Spectrum Assault On Russia Part IU. S. Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles line up by the Trondheim Fjord, Norway, Jan. Photo U. S. Marine CorpsThis article is part of a series on Western meddling to foment unrest and destabilize BRICS nations in an effort to ensure the continuation of Western economic and political control over the Global South. The first two parts, focusing on Brazil and South Africa, can be found here and here. Up next Part II on the assault on Russia, which focuses on the political, psychological and military aspects that run in tandem with the economic war on Moscow. NEW YORK The U. Peachy Keen Films Chekist. Categories Strangle, Death Fetish, Snuff Play, Shooting, Abuse, Rape, Bagging. Description We shall start in the dark, dank building. Peachy Keen Films Disposable Soldier Categories Strangle, Death Fetish, Snuff Play, Shooting, Abuse, Rape, Bagging Description Penny is guarding a. Autogenerated text from PDF. Judicial Watch Special Report The Anniversary the Benghazi Attack September 11, 2012 Unanswered Questions and the Quest for. A couple grieving the loss of their own daughter set out to rescue young girls sold into the sex slave trade. S. NATO Empire, with its centers of power in Washington, on Wall Street, and in the city of London, is on the offensive against the BRICS countries. This assault takes many forms, each tailored to its specific target. The ongoing soft coup in Brazil has recently entered a new stage with the impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff of the left wing Workers Party. Simultaneously, the destabilization of the ANC led government in South Africa continues as political forces align to remove President Jacob Zuma. These two situations illustrate clearly the very potent forms of subversion via Western funded political formations and movements being employed against Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the bloc of emerging economies also known as BRICS. However, when it comes to a country as large as Russia, with its vast military capabilities, consolidated and wildly popular political leadership, and growing antagonism toward the West, the tools available to the Empire to undermine and destabilize are in some ways more limited. Indeed, in the context of Russia, the popular mobilization pretext does not apply, and so that weapon in the imperial arsenal is blunted considerably. But there are other, equally potent and equally dangerous methods to achieve the desired effect. Russia is the target of a multi faceted, asymmetric campaign of destabilization that has employed economic, political, and psychological forms of warfare, each of which has been specifically designed to inflict maximum damage on the Kremlin. While the results of this multi pronged assault have been mixed, and their ultimate effect being the subject of much debate, Moscow is, without a doubt, ground zero in a global assault against the BRICS nations. Economic war Hitting Russia where its vulnerable. People walk past a sign indicating the US dollar, top, and euro, bottom, rates of a currency exchange in Moscow, Russia, 2. AP PhotoSergey PonomarevWhile Russia is a world class power militarily, it is highly vulnerable economically. For that obvious reason, this area has been a primary focus of the destabilization thrust. Watch The Sick House Online Fandango. Russia has for decades been overly reliant, if not entirely dependent, on revenues from the energy sector to maintain its economic growth and fund its budget. According to the U. S. Energy Information Administration and Russias Federal Customs Service, oil and gas sales accounted for 6. Russias total export revenues in 2. With more than two thirds of total export revenues and roughly 5. GDP, coming from oil and gas revenue, Russias very economic survival has been as dependent on energy as almost any country in the world. In light of this, its no surprise that the drop in oil prices over the 1. April 2. 01. 4 to January 2. Russia. Even many leading Russian officials have conceded that the negative impact to Russias economy is substantial, to say the least. At the World Economic Forum in January, former Russian Finance Minister Alexey Kudrin explained that not only has the drop in oil prices badly hurt the Russian economy, but the worst may be yet to come. Kudrin noted the potential for prices to drop even further, possibly even below 2. Specifically, its not just the loss of revenue, but the negative effect on wages and the currency which have many economic analysts and political figures worried. According to the Russian Federal Statistics Service, real wages for Russian workers have dropped significantly since the end of 2. This has been felt by ordinary Russians, whose wages have stagnated while inflation causes prices to shoot upwards and who have had to endure belt tightening in terms of personal consumption, and at the national level, where the Russian government has been facing a potentially large budget shortfall for 2. It must be noted, however, that recent months have seen an improvement in the relative performance of the ruble, but the long term outlook from experts remains gloomy. This has led many Russian analysts and policymakers to advocate yet again for a decreased dependence on energy revenues. They argue that the current climate could force economic restructuring away from the critical energy sector. Aside from Kudrin, Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Trutnev made the case for potential structural economic reforms, as did Vladimir Mau of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. Writing earlier this year in Vedomosti, Russias leading business publication, Mau explained The demand for oil as a commodity depends on technological progressAnd its not obvious that oil as a fuel will be always in demand in times of economic growth. With the change of the technological model, it is not ruled out that oil will become just a stock commodity for the energy and chemical industry. This last point how oil is used relative to the market is the most salient in other words, its the financialization of oil. But the analysis must go a step further and explore how the financialization is, in effect, a weaponization process as oil prices become increasingly the playthings of powerful financial institutions, particularly the major banks on Wall Street and in the city of London. And this is no mere conspiracy theory. How Wall Street targeted Russia using oil. Senator Sherrod Brown. Photo Senate Democrats via FlickrIn July 2. Sen. Sherrod Brown, chair of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Protection, opened a hearing to probe just how connected major Wall Street banks were to the holding of physical oil assets, and the attendant ability of these companies to manipulate oil prices. The findings of the hearing, considered damning by multiple analysts knowledgeable on the subject, prompted an investigation by the Senates Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, published as Wall Street Bank Involvement with Physical Commodities. The report highlighted just one of the big banks, Morgan Stanley, noting   One of Morgan Stanleys primary physical oil activities was to store vast quantities of oil in facilities located within the United States and abroad. According to Morgan Stanley, in the New York New Jersey Connecticut area alone, by 2. Morgan Stanley also had storage facilities in Europe and Asia. According to the Federal Reserve, by 2. Morgan Stanley held operating leases on over 1. Pam and Russ Martens of the well respected financial analysis site Wall. Street. On. Parade. With financial derivatives and 5. Indeed, the sheer scope of Morgan Stanleys market influence demonstrates the obvious fact that the major Wall Street banks, and their cousins in the city of London, are able to significantly affect global prices using multiple levers like supply and derivatives, among others. The Senate reports brazen honesty is likely the main reason the corporate media failed to cover it all. As noted in the report Due to their physical commodity activities, Goldman, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley incurred increased financial, operational, and catastrophic event risks, faced accusations of unfair trading advantages, conflicts of interest, and market manipulation, and intensified problems with being too big to manage or regulate, introducing new systemic risks into the U. S. financial system. But perhaps most jaw dropping is this January 2.